Comparison of interrupted and semi-continuous suture techniques in rheumatic valvular disease by analysis of paravalvular regurgitation following mitral valve replacement: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors

  • Yasir Bilal Khan Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.
  • Muhammad Ali Gohar Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.
  • Prerna Rani SICVD Sukkur.
  • Ahmad Abdullah Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.
  • Aamir Iqbal SICVD Sukkur,
  • Zeeshan Afzal Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2026.33.07.10234

Keywords:

Mitral Valve Replacement, Para-valvular Leak, Semi-continuous Technique

Abstract

Objective: To compare o fboth interrupted and continuous technique following mitral valve replacement in terms of paravalvular regurgitation in patients with rheumatic heart diseases. Study Design: Retrospective Cohort study. Setting: Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar. Period: 01/01/2022 to 31/12/2024. Methods: Analyzed 110 patients (46 males, 41.8%; 64 females, 58.2%) with a mean age of 39.8 ± 11.5 years and mean BMI of 23.3 ± 4.2, all of whom underwent isolated MVR for rheumatic pathology. Patients were grouped based on the suture technique used: semi-continuous or interrupted. Outcomes assessed included operative mortality, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, PVR severity, and cross-clamp time. Results: Operative mortality was identical in both groups, with 1 patient each (0.9%), accounting for a total mortality of 1.8% (p = 1.0). Most patients were categorized as NYHA Class I or II postoperatively, representing 44.0% and 50.5% of the overall cohort, respectively. NYHA Class III occurred in 1.8% of the semi-continuous group and 3.7% of the interrupted group. PVR rates were comparable between techniques, with any-degree PVR observed in 44.5% of the semi-continuous group and 41.8% of the interrupted group. Moderate-to-severe PVR was slightly more prevalent in the semi-continuous group (1.8%) compared with the interrupted group (0.9%); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5). Mean aortic cross-clamp time was significantly shorter for the semi-continuous technique (68.75 ± 22.2 minutes) than the interrupted technique (91.7 ± 27.3 minutes). Conclusion: Semi-continuous and interrupted suture techniques demonstrate comparable efficacy in preventing paravalvular regurgitation following rheumatic MVR, with no significant differences in operative mortality or postoperative functional class. The semi-continuous technique, however, offers the advantage of reduced cross-clamp time. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings and explore long-term outcomes.

Author Biographies

Yasir Bilal Khan, Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.

FCPS, Assistant Professor Cardiac Surgery, 

Muhammad Ali Gohar, Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.

FCPS, Assistant Professor Cardiac Surgery, 

Prerna Rani, SICVD Sukkur.

MBBS, Resident Cardiac Surgery, 

Ahmad Abdullah, Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.

MBBS, Resident Cardiac Surgery, 

Aamir Iqbal, SICVD Sukkur,

FCPS, Fellow Cardiac Surgery, 

Zeeshan Afzal, Peshawar Institute of Cardiology, Peshawar.

MBBS, Trainee Registrar Cardiac Surgery, 

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Origianl Article