Hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of two different doses of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors

  • Abdul Malik Mujahid Teaching Hospital D.G. Khan Medical College Dera Ghazi Khan.
  • Muhammad Wahid Saleem D.G. Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan.
  • Shahid Ali Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal.
  • Muhammad Umair Wahab Jinnah Hospital, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore.
  • Abdul Shakoor Gangaram Hospital, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore.
  • Asma Binte Saad MNCH Social Security Hospital D.G Khan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2023.30.04.7389

Keywords:

Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, Doses, Hemostatic Effect, Hemodynamic Effect, Lidocaine with Epinephrine

Abstract

Objective: To determine the hemostatic and hemodynamic effects of two different doses of epinephrine during endoscopic sinus surgery. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Department of Otolaryngology, Teaching Hospital, D. G. Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan. Period: 1st January, 2020 to 31st December, 2020. Material & Methods: A randomized control trail was done at ENT Department, Teaching Hospital Dera Ghazi Khan. 96 subjects were included and divided into two groups. Group-A patients received lidocaine hydrochloride, 2%, with 1:100,000 epinephrine while group-B patients received lidocaine, 2%, with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Data were collected through a structured proforma and analyzed using SPSS version 22.0. Numerical variables presented as mean and standard deviation and qualitative variables as frequency and percentages were calculated. Independent sample t test was used to compare the quantitative variables between both groups. Chi-square test was used to estimate the association between qualitative variables. P-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Among 30 patients of Group-A, 60.4% were males, mean age was 39.73+10.736 years and the mean blood loss was 202.58+12.218 ml. In Group-B, 64.6% were males, mean age was 39.35+11.421 years and the mean blood loss was 176.90+5.846 ml. In Group-A, mean heart rate at 0 minute, and 5 minutes was 76.54+1.786, and 76.65+1.296 while in Group-B was 75.50+2.568, and 73.88+1.886, respectively. In Group-A, mean SBP at 0, and 5 minutes was 108.17+3.191, and 107.17+2.234 while in Group-B was 106.25+3.795, and 103.56+1.821, respectively. Conclusion: Lidocaine hydrochloride 2% with epinephrine dose of 1:200,000 is more effective during endoscopic sinus surgery than epinephrine dose of 1:100,000 with Lidocaine hydrochloride 2%.

Author Biographies

Abdul Malik Mujahid, Teaching Hospital D.G. Khan Medical College Dera Ghazi Khan.

MBBS, FCPS (Plastic Surgery), Senior Registrar Plastic Surgery, Burn & Plastic Surgery Department 

Muhammad Wahid Saleem, D.G. Khan Medical College, Dera Ghazi Khan.

MBBS, FCPS (ENT), Assistant Professor ENT, 

Shahid Ali, Sahiwal Medical College, Sahiwal.

MBBS, FCPS (ENT), Assistant Professor ENT, 

Muhammad Umair Wahab, Jinnah Hospital, Allama Iqbal Medical College, Lahore.

MBBS, FCPS (ENT), Assistant Professor ENT, 

Abdul Shakoor, Gangaram Hospital, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore.

MBBS, FCPS (ENT), Senior Registrar ENT,

Asma Binte Saad, MNCH Social Security Hospital D.G Khan.

MBBS, Retainee Women Medical Officer, 

Downloads

Published

2023-03-31