SHOULDICE VERSUS LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR

Authors

  • WASEEM SADIQ AWAN Jinah Hospital, Lahore
  • MUHAMMAD REHMAN GULZAR Punjab Medical College / Allied Hospital, Faisalabad.
  • GHULAM MUSTAFA ARAIN Jinnah Hospital, Lahore
  • Raza Younus Jinnah Hospital, Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2010.17.03.2472

Keywords:

Hernia, Shouldice, Lichtenstein

Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of tissue based Shouldice repair with the Lichtenstein tension free repair of inguinal hernia. Design: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Period: From Jan 2004 to Dec 2006. Setting: Surgical Unit-II, Allama Iqbal Medical College / Jinnah Hospital Lahore, Pakistan. Patients & Methods: A total of 156 patients were included in this study were equally divided into two groups. Results: The mean age was 45 years. After a follow up of upto 2 years there was significant difference in the recurrence rate. It was 5% in the Shouldice group and 1.28 %in the Lichtenstein group. Similarly chronic pain was also much higher i.e. 5% in the Shouldice group compared to 1.28% in Lichtenstein Group. The rate of hematoma and seroma formation was the same (1.28%) in both groups, however infection was seen slightly more in Lichtenstein repair (3.84%) as compared to Shouldice repair (2.56%). Conclusion: Tension free Lichtenstein technique was found to be superior to the tissue based Shouldice repair with respect to post operative complications and recurrence.

Author Biographies

WASEEM SADIQ AWAN, Jinah Hospital, Lahore

Senior Registrar Surgery Surgical Unit-II

MUHAMMAD REHMAN GULZAR, Punjab Medical College / Allied Hospital, Faisalabad.

Assistant Professor of Surgery

GHULAM MUSTAFA ARAIN, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore

Associate Professor of Surgery

Director Accident & Emergency Department

Raza Younus, Jinnah Hospital, Lahore

Department of Surgery

Surgical Unit-II

Downloads

Published

2010-09-10