Efficacy of bowel preparation for colonoscopy with olive oil plus low volume polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus conventional volume polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution.

Authors

  • Nouman Hameed King Edward Medical College, Lahore.
  • Muhammad Asif Gul Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • Farooq Mohyud Din Chaudhary Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.
  • Bilal Hameed Kuwait.
  • Muhammad Amjad King Fahad Military Complex, KSA.
  • Usman Hameed The Children Hospital, Lahore.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2022.29.07.6707

Keywords:

Bowel Preparation, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, Colonoscopy, Polyethylene Glycol-electrolyte Lavage Solution

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of bowel preparation with an olive oil plus low volume (2 liters) polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution (PEG-ELS) and conventional volume (4 liters) PEG-ELS solution. Study Design: Randomized, Controlled Trial. Setting: Lahore General Hospital. Period: September 2017 and November 2018. Material & Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. Group A patients were given olive oil plus low volume (2 liters) PEG-ELS and Group B patients were given conventional volume (4 liters) PEG-ELS solution. Achievement of the adequate preparation was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). A questionnaire was used in assessing the ease or difficulty of ingesting the bowel-cleansing preparation. All analysis was conducted with SPSS 20.0. Results: Of the total 162 patients randomized, 24 were excluded due to various reasons. Of 138 studied patients, mean age was 40.88 ± 13.75 years, 90 (65.21%) were male and 48 (34.78%) were female. Overall, 42 (30.4%) patients had Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) 8 and 9 indicating excellent bowel preparation, 38 (27.5%) had good bowel preparation with score 6 and 7, 30 (21.7%) patients had poor bowel preparation with score 3-5, and 28 (20.3%) patients had inadequate bowel preparation with score 0-2. The mean BBPS was 6.11 ± 2.6 with the olive oil preparation and 4.63 ± 2.81 with conventional PEG-ELS preparation (P = <0.005). More patients in Olive Oil group had excellent bowel preparation as compared to conventional group (43% versus 15%, p <0.005). The mean time of examination was 23.2 minutes in Group A and 21.85 in Group B (P <0.05). Mean time for colonoscopy was much higher (28.75 min.) in patients with a BBPS score of < 3. 61%of patients in Olive Oil group experienced no side effects as compared to 43% in the conventional PEG-ELS group (p < 0.05). Abdominal pain was the most common side effect observed, more frequent in the conventional PEG-ELS group (30% versus 4.9%, p<0.05). Conclusion: Low volume PEG plus olive oil is a valid alternative and more applicable to bowel preparation for colonoscopy than conventional volume PEG, with superior efficacy, better compliance and tolerability and better safety profile.

Author Biographies

Nouman Hameed, King Edward Medical College, Lahore.

MBBS, FCPS (Gastroenterology), Medical Officer Gastroenterologist, 

Muhammad Asif Gul, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.

MBBS, FCPS (Gastroenterology), MCPS (Med), MCPS (HPE), Associate Professor Gastroenterology, 

Farooq Mohyud Din Chaudhary, Nishtar Medical University, Multan, Pakistan.

MBBS, FCPS (Gastroenterology), MRCP (UK), Senior Registrar Gastroenterology, 

Bilal Hameed, Kuwait.

MBBS, FCPS (Medicine), Consultant Physician, 

Muhammad Amjad, King Fahad Military Complex, KSA.

MBBS, FCPS (Gastroenterology), Consultant Gastroenterology, 

Usman Hameed, The Children Hospital, Lahore.

MBBS, FCPS (Paeds), Consultant Paediatric, 

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30