BURNS IN CHILDREN;

EARLY VERSUS LATE EXCISION AND GRAFTING

Authors

  • S. HAROON MANSOOR King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore.
  • MOHAMED MAHMOUD EL-HARRAZIN King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore. 

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2012.19.05.2407

Keywords:

Burns, Skin grafting, Early grafting

Abstract

Burns are among the most devastating of all home injuries with formidable sequelae ranging from considerable physical
disability to emotional and mental trauma. Patients of burn require prolonged hospitalization resulting into considerable financial burden on
patient as well as the state. Treatment of burns can be made cost effective by early excision and grafting of the burned areas. A randomized
controlled study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of early versus delayed excision and skin grafting in pediatric burns. Out of 80 burned
children, 30 underwent early excision and grafting whereas 50 were treated with delayed excision and grafting. Mean percent graft take was
96.67 in early and 88.40 in delayed group. Over all post operative complications like minor graft rejection was found in 26% cases of early and
48% of delayed group whereas major graft rejection was found in 14% of delayed group only. Post operative contractures developed in 8% of
delayed group. Mean hospital stay was 13.66 and 37.46 days for early and delayed excision and grafting respectively. Early excision and
grafting in pediatric burns is a superior and cost effective to delayed excision and grafting in terms of post operative complications, cosmesis
and hospital stay.

Author Biographies

S. HAROON MANSOOR, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore.

Department of Pediatric Surgery,

MOHAMED MAHMOUD EL-HARRAZIN, King Edward Medical University/ Mayo Hospital, Lahore. 

Department of Pediatric Surgery,

Downloads

Published

2012-10-08